Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.1% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 9.2% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 7.0% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 53 Fragile Recovery
2019 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 0.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 0.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 42 Fragile Recovery
2014 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JILLIAN LIEBL Executive Director 4.3% of Rev
BRETT HENDERSON CHIEF BUSINESS OFFICER 3.8% of Rev
MARGERY FELDBERG Board Member
KILEY FLINT Board Member
BECKY FREY Board Member
LANG INGALLS Board Member
DREW KUMPURIS Board Member
BEV LUECKEMEYER Board Member
JULIE MCNEILL Board Member
LEIGH MUNDY Board Member
BILL PEATROSS Board Member
ARVIN RAMGOOLAM Board Member
SAM ROBARDS Board Member
BARBARA ROSENBLATT Board Member
TARA SCHOEDINGER Board Member
BILL CARTER Board President
SCOTT KING Board President
ADELE BROUGHTON Secretary
BOB VALENTINE Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA MASON CO-ED, OPER 3.2% of Rev
JILLIAN LIEBL CO-ED, DIR O 2.7% of Rev
BROOKE HARLESS MACMILLAN CO-ED, ART D 2.5% of Rev
TONY BARNARD Board Member
ADELE BROUGHTON Board Member
WILLIAM CARTER Board President
ROSALIND COOK Board Member
LYDIA DEUTSCH Secretary
MARGERY FELDBERG VICE PRESIDE
BECKY FREY Board Member
LANG INGALLS Board Member
DREW KUMPURIS Board Member
LEIGH MUNDY Treasurer
ARVIN RAMGOOLAM Board Member
SAM ROBARDS Board Member
BARBARA GLAZER ROSENBLATT Board Member
TARA SCHOEDINGER Board Member
RANDI STROH Board Member
BOB VALENTINE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TONY BARNARD Board Member
KATHY BARNHART Board Member
JOEL BENISCH Board Member
MICKIE BRAGALONE Board Member
ADELE BROUGHTON Board Member
BILL CARTER VICE PRESIDE
ROSALIND COOK Board Member
LYDIA DEUTSCH Board Member
MARGERY FELDBERG Board Member
BECKY FREY Board Member
ALISSA JOHNSON Secretary
LEIGH MUNDY Board President
ARVIN RAMGOOLAM Board Member
SAM ROBARD Board Member
DAVE STANGL Treasurer
RANDI STROH Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TONY BARNARD Board Member
KATHY BARNHART Board Member
JOEL BENISCH PAST PRESIDE
MICKIE BRAGALONE Board Member
ADELE BROUGHTON Board Member
BILL CARTER Board Member
ROSALIND COOK Board Member
MARGERY FELDBERG Board Member
BECKY FREY Board Member
MARILYN GENTRY Secretary
ALISSA JOHNSON Board Member
MONA MERRILL Board Member
STEVE MORRIS Board Member
LEIGH MUNDY Board President
SUZANNE PIERSON Board Member
ARVIN RAMGOOLAM Board Member
DAVE STANGL Treasurer
RANDI STROH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.