Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
0
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — — 46 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dierdre McDowell Board President —
Janet Sims Board President —
Louise Vanasse Secretary —
Betty Winters Secretary —
Jesse Carnes Treasurer —
Jerry Bohannon Parliamentarian —
Marcheta Leighton-Beasley Board Member —
Pat Carnes Board Member —
Galina Chaudhry Board Member —
Brenda Harvey-Traylor Board Member —
Kirk Hickey Board Member —
Clarice Nelson Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dierdre McDowell Board President —
Janet Sims Board President —
Louise Vanasse Secretary —
Jesse Carnes Treasurer —
Jerry Bohanon Parliamentarian —
Larissa Bither Board Member —
Pat Carnes Board Member —
Galina Chaudhry Board Member —
Sylvia Dekmezian Board Member —
Brenda Harvey-Traylor Board Member —
Kirk Hickey Board Member —
Pedro Miramon Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Sims Board President —
Marcheta Leighton-Beasley Board President —
Gerry Aitken Vice President —
Larissa Bither Vice President —
Jess Carnes Treasurer —
Pat Carnes Vice President —
Don Clarke Vice President —
Sylvia Dekmezian Vice President —
Rubena Gracia Secretary —
Deidre McDowell Board President —
Isabel Trainer Vice President —
Betty Winters Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Sims Board President —
Lynn Gissel Board President —
Gerry Aitken Vice President —
Gwyneth Campbell Vice President —
Jess Carnes Treasurer —
Pat Carnes Vice President —
Don Clarke Vice President —
Sylvia Dekmezian Vice President —
Janis Doty Vice President —
Brenda Harvey-Traylor Secretary —
Kirk Hickey Vice President —
Marcheta Leighton-Beasley Board President —
Deirdre McDowell Vice President —
Isabel Trainer Vice President —
Betty Winters Secretary —
Fred Gott Parliamentarian —
Jerry Bohannon Board Member —
Sylvia Carroll Board Member —
Patte Comstock Board Member —
Christa Cooper Board Member —
Alex DiBagno Board Member —
Jane Egner Board Member —
Alice Gates Board Member —
Imelda Gott Board Member —
Rubena Gracia Board Member —
Adelma Graham Board Member —
Heide Loos Board Member —
Jo Lyday Board Member —
Wynne Mattison Board Member —
Suzanne Page-Pryde Board Member —
Penny Parish Board Member —
Allyn Risley Board Member —
Jennifer Stearns Board Member —
Rhonda Sweeney Board Member —
Kris Taylor Board Member —
Bill Walker Board Member —
Jesse FWeir Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 483 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.