Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 11.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 14.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 13.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 13.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 12.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 11.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 11.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 15.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 5.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 10.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 12.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 7.4% 40 Fragile Recovery
2011 5.5% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATTY NEUWIRTH EXECUTIVE DI 11.7% of Rev
DAVID JACKSON Board President
DORIS LAMBERT VICE PRESIDE
LINDA CHAPMAN Secretary
JO ANN KNECHT Treasurer
MELISSA BECK Board Member
PAM BRISOLARA Board Member
DOUG BROWN Board Member
TANYA CASE Board Member
TIM DILEY Board Member
BLAKE DUTCHER Board Member
JANICE FRITSCH Board Member
CAROL GARDNER Board Member
KATHRYN HICKMAN Board Member
JIM LAMBERT Board Member
PIERE MARIANO Board Member
RONDA NORRELL Board Member
CINDY O'CONNOR Board Member
CONNER SASSEEN Board Member
SALLY SIMPSON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATTY NEUWIRTH EXECUTIVE DI 11.7% of Rev
MELISSA BECK Board Member
SHAUN CALIX Board Member
TANYA CASE Board Member
LINDA CHAPMAN Secretary
TIM DILEY Board Member
BLAKE DUTCHER Board Member
JANICE FRITSCH Board Member
CAROL GARDNER Board Member
KATHRYN HICKMAN Board Member
DAVID JACKSON Board President
MARTIN JOHNSTON Board Member
JO ANN KNECHT Treasurer
DORIS LAMBERT VICE PRESIDE
JIM LAMBERT Board Member
PIERE MARIANO Board Member
RONDA NORRELL Board Member
CINDY O'CONNOR Board Member
SALLY SIMPSON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATTY NEUWIRTH EXECUTIVE DI 11.1% of Rev
MELISSA BECK Board Member
SHAUN CALIX Board Member
TANYA CASE Board Member
LINDA CHAPMAN Secretary
BARBARA CURRY Board Member
BLAKE DUTCHER Board Member
CAROL GARDNER Board Member
KATHRYN HICKMAN Board Member
DAVID JACKSON Board President
MARTIN JOHNSTON Board Member
REBECCA KINSLOW Board Member
JO ANN KNECHT Treasurer
DORIS LAMBERT VICE PRESIDE
JIM LAMBERT Board Member
PIERE MARIANO Board Member
BARBARA MOELLER Board Member
ROBERT MUNOZ Board Member
RONDA NORRELL Board Member
CINDY O'CONNOR Board Member
SALLY SIMPSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 67 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (0 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.