Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 21.6% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 50 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 10.6% 50 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 18.2% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 17.5% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 20.0% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 19.1% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 13.1% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 19.8% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 23.1% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 3.3% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 4.5% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 3.3% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE SORRELL EXECUTIVE DI
KIM SMITH Board President
STEPHANIE FORREST VICE PRESIDE
JASON SIMPSON Treasurer
LIBBY SUBLETT Secretary
APRYL LEGGETT Board Member
CHERYL CORNELIUS OCH Board Member
DAVID NICKLOY Board Member
ISAAC SHEETS Board Member
KATHLEEN GERETY Board Member
KYM MORELLA Board Member
PHIL HANEY Board Member
ROBERT BABCOCK Board Member
ROGER COLLIER Board Member
SCOTT GREGORY Board Member
SCOTT MURTHA Board Member
WILLIAM FERRARA Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SORRELL BRUCE EXECUTIVE DI 21.6% of Rev
MURTHA SCOTT Board President
SMITH KIM VICE PRESIDE
FORREST STEPHANIE Secretary
SIMPSON JASON Treasurer
MORELLA KYM PAST PRESIDE
CORNELIUS OCHS CHERYL Board Member
FAINGOLD NOAM Board Member
FERRARA WILLIAM Board Member
GERETY KATHLEEN Board Member
GREGORY SCOTT Board Member
HANEY PHIL Board Member
LEGGETT APRYL Board Member
NICKLOY DAVID Board Member
SHEETS ISAAC Board Member
SUBLETT LIBBY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SORRELL BRUCE EXECUTIVE DI
MORELLA KYM Board President
MURTHA SCOTT VICE-PRESIDE
SMITH KIM Treasurer
FORREST STEPHANIE Secretary
FARR CLAIRE PAST PRESIDE
CORNELIUS OCHS CHERYL Board Member
FAINGOLD NOAM Board Member
GERETY KATHLEEN Board Member
GHADRY OMAR Board Member
GREGORY SCOTT Board Member
HANEY PHIL Board Member
HERNANDEZ JOSE LUIS Board Member
NICKLOY DAVID Board Member
RAUSH NICK Board Member
SPOO ROBERT Board Member
SUBLETT LIBBY Board Member
WOOD EMILY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SORRELL BRUCE EXECUTIVE DI 20.8% of Rev
WOOD EMILY Board Member
CAWIEZELL GILLIAN Board Member
ARNDT JOSEPH Board Member
GERETY KATHLEEN Board Member
SMITH KIM Board Member
MORELLA KYM Board President
FRAZIER LINDA Board Member
HERNANDEZ JOSE LUIS Board Member
MCILHANY MARY Board Member
FAINGOLD NOAM Board Member
GHADRY OMAR Board Member
HANEY PHIL Board Member
DOOLIN RYAN Treasurer
GREGORY SCOTT Board Member
MURTHA SCOTT VICE-PRESIDE
JIN SOOYHUN Board Member
FORREST STEPHANIE Board Member
LYON MYERS BETHANY Board Member
SCHEIN CAITLIN Secretary
CORNELIUS OCHS CHERYL Board Member
FARR CLAIRE PAST PRESIDE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 14 points above the peer median (50 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.