Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
27
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRANDON TRENT Board President
SHARON PIERSON Secretary
WILLIAM HARRIS Board Member
DAVID PIERSON ADVISORY BOARD

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRANDON TRENT Board President
LAURIE BEARE Secretary
KAY COBB Treasurer
BRUCE WEBB Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRANDON TRENT Board President
SHARON PIERSON Secretary
REECE MORREL Jr Treasurer
DAVID PIERSON ADVISORY BOARD
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (5 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 24 → 27 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.