Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 16.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 16.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 10.0% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 15.0% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 14.3% 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 15.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 8.7% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 13.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 7.0% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 11.8% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 14.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 12.8% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 10.0% 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matthew Anderson Board Member —
Marjorie Atwood Board Member —
Jon Fisher Parliamentarian —
Barbara Gabel Board Member —
Farooq Karim Board Member —
Kathryn Kenney Board Member —
Jacquelyn Knapp Board Member —
Drew Knox Board Member —
Kyle Larson Board Member —
Heather Lunsford Board Member —
John Marshall Board President —
Kirsten Olds Board President —
Diane Salamon Treasurer —
Douglas Sorocco Board President —
Russ Yeubner Board Member —
Christopher Winland Board Member —
Ricco Wright Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Krystle D Kaye Executive Director 12.2% of Rev
Susan Agee Board Member —
Marjorie Atwood Board Member —
Bob Curtis Board Member —
Jon Fisher Parliamentarian —
Barbara Gabel Board Member —
Anna Inhofe Board Member —
Farooq Karim Board Member —
Kathryn Kenney Board Member —
Drew Knox Board Member —
Kyle Larson Board Member —
Heather Lunsford Board Member —
John Marshall Board President —
Laura Massenat Board Member —
Kirsten Olds Board Member —
Chris Sker Rogers Board Member —
Diane Salamon Treasurer —
Douglas Sorocco Board President —
Chris Winland Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Krystle D Kaye Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
Susan Agee Board Member —
Marjorie Atwood Board Member —
Bob Curtis Board Member —
Gina Ellis Board Member —
Jon Fisher Board Member —
Barbara Gabel Board Member —
Saiyada Garezi Treasurer —
Susan Green Board President —
Drew Knox Board Member —
Kyle Larson Board Member —
John Marshall Board President —
Travis Mason Board Member —
Kirsten Olds Board Member —
Laura Massenat Board Member —
Diane Salamon Secretary —
Douglas Sorocco Board President —
Chris Winland Board Member —
Dean Wyatt Board Member —
Jake Yunker Parlimentarian —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 52 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 69 points below the peer median (0 vs. 69).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.