Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
38
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.7% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 9.0% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 12.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 11.3% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 7.4% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 8.0% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 7.3% 44 Fragile Recovery
2016 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AUSTIN KLOSOSKY Executive Dir. 9.7% of Rev
JAMIE SHOUSE Board President
KRISTEN ELDER Board Member
SHAWN RICHARDSON Treasurer
JESSICA SCHWAGER Board Member
KANIKA BROWN Board President
ALYSON MOSES Board Member
JENNIFER STEVENSON Board Member
AMANDA LOPATA Board Member
BRENT SMITH Board Member
EMILY TAYLOR Board Member
LESLIE TE Board Member
OLIVIA CASTREJANA Board Member
GINA ELLIS Board Member
RILEY JOSEPH Secretary

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AUSTIN KLOSOSKY Executive Dir. 8.7% of Rev
JAMIE SHOUSE Board President
CHARLIE MONNOT Board Member
SHAWN RICHARDSON Treasurer
EMILY BLAKE Board President
KANIKA BROWN Secretary
AMBER CORBIN Board Member
SINA FARZANEH Board Member
PAUL SHINN Board Member
EMILY TAYLOR Board Member
LESLIE TE Board Member
LOU CARMICHAEL Board Member
OLIVIA CASTREJANA Board Member
GINA ELLIS Board Member
RILEY JOSEPH Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYN ADAMS Outgoing Ex Dir 7.6% of Rev
JAMIE SHOUSE Board Member
EMILY BLAKE Board Member
CHRIS TUCKER OK
LESLIE TE Board Member
GRAHAM HARRIS Board President
WESLEY BURT Board President
RANDY K MACON Board Member
JULIET HILL Board Member
HEATHAR PRIMUS Board Member
IAN CLARK Board Member
AMBER CORBIN Board Member
CHARLIE MONNOT Treasurer
MICHAEL MYERS Executive Dir.

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYN ADAMS Executive Dir. 6.8% of Rev
JAMIE SHOUSE Board Member
EMILY BLAKE Board Member
CHRIS TUCKER OK
LESLIE TE Board Member
GRAHAM HARRIS Board President
WESLEY BURT Board President
RANDY K MACON Board Member
JULIET HILL Board Member
HEATHAR PRIMUS Board Member
IAN CLARK Board Member
AMBER CORBIN Board Member
CHARLIE MONNOT Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYN ADAMS Executive Dir. 5.6% of Rev
WESLEY HURT Board President
GRAHAM HARRIS Board President
CHARLIE MONNOT Treasurer
AMBER CORBIN Board Member
GARY TUCKER Board Member
EMILY BLAKE Board Member
LESLIE TE Board Member
JAMIE SHOUSE Board Member
IAN CLARK Board Member
JULIETTE HILL Board Member
EMMA ROLLS Board Member
HEATHER PRIMAS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 67 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.