Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 2.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 5.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 2.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 10.1% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 12.1% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 12.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 11.9% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 9.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 8.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 11.2% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 12.1% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 7.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER GREENING Board Member 3.4% of Rev
REGINA TURRENTINE Board Member
TRACIE CHAPMAN Board Member
ANDREW S HARLOW Board Member
PATTY COFFEY Board Member
TUCK WILKINSON Board Member
CEDRIC BAILEY Board Member
RAYMOND PEMBERTON Board President
KATHY FOX Board Member
GARY SCHEIDE Board President
KIM THOMPSON Board Member
WILLIAM RAHHAL Treasurer
HAVEY COFFEY Board Member
WILLIAM DOLMAN Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KENNETH BOHANNON Board Member 4.0% of Rev
REGINA TURRENTINE Board Member
BILL RAHHAL Board Member
GOVERNOR BILL ANOATUBBY Board Member
TRACIE CHAPMAN Board President
ANDREW S HARLOW Board President
PATTY COFFEY Board Member
TUCK WILKINSON Board Member
CEDRIC BAILEY Board Member
RAYMOND PEMBERTON Board President
KATHY FOX Treasurer
GARY SCHEIDE Board Member
KIM THOMPSON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KENNETH BOHANNON Board Member 3.9% of Rev
JAN TINDALE Board Member
GOVERNOR BILL ANOATUBBY Board Member
BILL RAHHAL Treasurer
TOM DUNLAP Board Member
JOHN OTEY Board Member
CAROL LEE SIMMS Board Member
REGINA TURRENTINE Board Member
ANDREW S HARLOW Board President
TRACIE CHAPMAN Board President
PAT WEAVER-MEYERS Board Member
PATTY COFFEY Board Member
TUCK WILKINSON Board President
KEITH KING Board Member
LUANN WALKER Board Member
CEDRIC BAILEY Board Member
RAYMOND PEMBERTON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KENNETH BOHANNON Board Member 4.0% of Rev
JAN TINDALE Board Member
GOVERNOR BILL ANOATUBBY Board Member
BILL RAHHAL Treasurer
TOM DUNLAP Board Member
JOHN OTEY Board Member
CAROL LEE SIMMS Board Member
REGINA TURRENTINE Board Member
ANDREW S HARLOW Board President
TRACIE CHAPMAN Board President
PAT WEAVER-MEYERS Board Member
PATTY COFFEY Board Member
TUCK WILKINSON Board President
KEITH KING Board Member
LUANN WALKER Board Member
CEDRIC BAILEY Board Member
RAYMOND PEMBERTON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KENNETH BOHANNON Board Member 3.7% of Rev
JAN TINDALE Board Member
GOVERNOR BILL ANOATUBBY Board Member
BILL RAHHAL Board Member
TOM DUNLAP Board Member
JOHN OTEY Board Member
CAROL LEE SIMMS Board Member
REGINA TURRENTINE Board Member
ANDREW S HARLOW Treasurer
TRACIE CHAPMAN Board President
PAT WEAVER-MEYERS Board Member
PATTY COFFEY Board Member
TUCK WILKINSON Board President
KEITH KING Board Member
LUANN WALKER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.