Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 11.4% 39 Fragile Recovery
2012 13.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RHONDA CARR Board Member
CHARLES AMES Board Member
LESLIE HAMILTON Treasurer
FRED COOK Secretary
MIKE DUNLAP Board Member
ZACH ELKINS Board President
SARAH STOGNER Board Member
SAM POWELL Board Member
KIRK JACKSON Board Member
TOM O'CONNOR Board Member
STEVEN HOFFER Board Member
MELANIE BAYLES Board Member
CRYSTAL SARE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RHONDA CARR Board Member
CHARLES AMES Board Member
LESLIE HAMILTON Treasurer
FRED COOK Secretary
MIKE DUNLAP Board Member
ZACH ELKINS Board President
GINA ELIAS Board Member
NATALIE KILLINGSWORTH Board Member
SARAH STOGNER Board Member
AMBER VARGAS Board Member
WYATT GERTH Board Member
JOHN MANLEY Board Member
MICHAEL HARP Board Member
TOM O'CONNOR Board President
STEVEN HOFFER Board Member
CHRISTA MARTNEY Board Member
CRYSTAL SARE Board Member
MILLIE SERRANO Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RHONDA CARR Board Member
CHARLES AMES Board Member
LESLIE HAMILTON Treasurer
FRED COOK Board Member
CAROLINE CASSELBERRY Board Member
ZACH ELKINS Board Member
MARCIA HANSEN Board Member
NATALIE KILLINGSWORTH Board Member
BECKY TUPPER Board Member
AMBER VARGAS Board Member
JASON HORN Board Member
JOHN MANLEY Board Member
ANDERSON MEHRLE Board Member
TOM O'CONNOR Board President
JESSICA KRAUSE Secretary
BILL RILEY Board President
MARVA STROMAN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (5 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.