Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 52 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 64 Stable Stable Watch
2020 — — — 38 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY NELSON Board Member —
BAILEY WILSON Board Member —
BRICE DONALDSON Board Member —
WENDI BETZ Board Member —
MARY FISCHABER Board Member —
KAREN LOUGHMAN Board Member —
MARY MCDONALD Board Member —
HEATHER PALMER Board Member —
BLAKE RECKNAGEL Board Member —
GINNY SHIPLEY Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER MCDANIEL Board Member —
ALEX JOHNSON Board Member —
EVAN CHERMACK Board Member —
CARMEN BALL Treasurer —
CHARLET RINGWALD Board President —
JANET JONES Secretary —
KATIE PEARCE Board President —
FRANK BAKER Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANET JONES Board Member —
FRANK BAKER Board Member —
WENDI BETZ Board Member —
MARY FISCHABER Board Member —
KAREN LOUGHMAN Board Member —
CATINA SUNDVALL Board Member —
MARY MCDONALD Board Member —
BLAKE RECKNAGEL Board Member —
GINNY SHIPLEY Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER MCDANIEL Board Member —
EVAN CHERMACK Board Member —
CARMEN BALL Treasurer —
CHARLET RINGWALD Board President —
EMILY NELSON Board President —
KATIE PEARCE Secretary —
BAILEY WILSON Treasurer —
KEVIN BORYCZKI Board President —
ALEX JOHNSON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARMEN BALL Treasurer —
CHARLET RINGWALD Board President —
EMILY NELSON Board President —
JANET JONES Board Member —
KATIE PEARCE Secretary —
BAILEY WILSON Treasurer —
KEVIN BORYCZKI Board President —
FRANK BAKER Board Member —
WENDI BETZ Board Member —
MARY FISCHABER Board Member —
KAREN LOUGHMAN Board Member —
MARY MCDONALD Board Member —
HEATHER PALMER Board Member —
BLAKE RECKNAGEL Board Member —
GINNY SHIPLEY Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER MCDANIEL Board Member —
ALEX JOHNSON Board Member —
EVAN CHERMACK Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARMEN BALL Treasurer —
TIFFANY HARVEY Board Member —
JIM CLARK Board Member —
JANET JONES Board President —
PIERCE JONES Board Member —
BRICE DONALDSON Board Member —
SHARON HUME Board Member —
MITCH LYON Board Member —
TREE PERKINS Board Member —
TERRI GALER Board President —
LARRY KINER Board Member —
MERRY LEE NAFUS Board Member —
JILL PATTERSON RUDING Board Member —
KAY REED SHAUGHNESSY Board Member —
CHELSEA DAVIS Board Member —
CATINA SUNDVALL Board President —
COURTNEY STRZINEK Secretary —
TAMMY WILSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 94 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.