Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 64 Stable Stable Watch
2023 Hidden Hidden 61 Stable Decline Risk
2022 65 Stable Stable Watch
2021 62 Stable Stable Watch
2020 56 Fragile Recovery
2019 58 Fragile Recovery
2018 57 Fragile Recovery
2017 53 Fragile Recovery
2016 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Fragile Recovery
2013 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Misty Brooks Board President
Nicholas Adkinson Board President
Catherine DeVaughan Secretary
Teddi McAbee Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dean McSpadden Board President
Ryan Driskill Board President
Ann Brown Secretary
Aleta Bowman Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dean McSpadden Board President
Ryan Driskill Board President
Ann Brown Secretary
Aleta Bowman Treasurer
Dean McSpadden Board President
Ryan Driskill Board President
Ann Brown Secretary
Aleta Bowman Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points above the peer median (90 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.