Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 52 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 Hidden Hidden — 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 61 Stable Decline Risk
2016 — — — 65 Stable Stable Watch
2015 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOUG HOLLOWAY Treasurer —
STEVE CRISPINO Board Member —
PAT HORNSBY CROCHET Board Member —
ROBYN HORNSBY Board Member —
GEORGE BEAUDRY Board President —
SCOTT COURVILLE Board Member —
NELSON BERTINOT Board Member —
LINDA BOURGEOIS Board Member —
BRITTANY ROGERS-BOURQUE Board Member —
MARTHA CAZAUBON Board Member —
EDWINA YAKUPZAK Board Member —
GORDON DOIRON Board Member —
HOPE DAIGLE Board Member —
STEPHANIE KENNEY-GOMEZ Board Member —
PAUL LABAT Board President —
DANIELLE MARCHIVE Board Member —
SUE PEACE Board Member —
REGGIE PONTIFF Board Member —
LIZ FOLSE Board Member —
GAYLE WALTERS-BARRIOS Board Member —
ANN ROBICHAUX Secretary —
CAITLIN LAPEYROUSE Board Member —
KASON HEBERT Board Member —
PATTI LOUPE Board Member —
DANNA SCHWAB Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOUG HOLLOWAY Board President —
STEVE CRISPINO Board President —
PAT HORNSBY CROCHET Secretary —
ROBYN HORNSBY Treasurer —
STEVE DUPLANTIS Board Member —
GEORGE BEAUDRY Board Member —
DONNA BENDA Board Member —
NELSON BERTINOT Board Member —
LINDA BOURGEOIS Board Member —
BRITTANY ROGERS BOURQUE Board Member —
MARTHA CAZAUBON Board Member —
EDWINA YAKUPZAK Board Member —
GORDON DOIRON Board Member —
BILL ELLZEY Board Member —
STEPHANIE KENNEY-GOMEZ Board Member —
PAUL LABAT Board Member —
DANIELLE MARCHIVE Board Member —
SUE PEACE Board Member —
REGGIE PONTIFF Board Member —
ETHAN RODRIGUE Board Member —
JEANNE SCOTT Board Member —
GAYLE WALTERS Board Member —
GREG WHITNEY Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE CRISPINO Board President —
DOUG HOLLOWAY Board President —
PAT HORNSBY CROCHET Secretary —
ROBYN HORNSBY Treasurer —
STEVE DUPLANTIS Board Member —
GEORGE BEAUDRY Board Member —
DONNA BENDA Board Member —
NELSON BERTINOT Board Member —
LINDA BOURGEOIS Board Member —
BRITTANY ROGERS BOURQUE Board Member —
MARTHA CAZAUBON Board Member —
EDWINA YAKUPZAK Board Member —
GORDON DOIRON Board Member —
BILL ELLZEY Board Member —
STEPHANIE KENNEY-GOMEZ Board Member —
PAUL LABAT Board Member —
DANIELLE MARCHIVE Board Member —
SUE PEACE Board Member —
REGGIE PONTIFF Board Member —
ETHAN RODRIGUE Board Member —
JEANNE SCOTT Board Member —
GAYLE WALTERS Board Member —
GREG WHITNEY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 99 other orgs in LA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 18 points below the peer median (50 vs. 68).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.