Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 64 Stable Stable Watch
2020 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 65 Stable Stable Watch
2017 65 Stable Stable Watch
2016 61 Stable Decline Risk
2015 65 Stable Stable Watch
2014 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 65 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DUSTIN M DELAUNE Board President
PENNY DIEZ Board President
ROD OLSON Treasurer
TABBY ARMSTRONG Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 49 other orgs in LA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 12 points above the peer median (45 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 65 → 45 over 5 years (declining by 20 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.