Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 57 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 54 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JIM CALNON | Board President | — | ||
| MICHAEL COUGHLIN | Board President | — | ||
| LEANN YELTON | Secretary | — | ||
| TOM LAVIN | Treasurer | — | ||
| ANDREW CASTINE | Board Member | — | ||
| SARA MUNSON | Board Member | — | ||
| GABRIELLE DION | Board Member | — | ||
| SARAH KING | Board Member | — | ||
| KAREN DISPOS DEBOOS | Board Member | — | ||
| DIANE DISPOS KLEIN | Board Member | — | ||
| DENISE COUGHLIN | Board Member | — | ||
| JERROD OLSEN | Board Member | — | ||
| JAMIE ROBERTS | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dana Berry | Board President | — | ||
| Michael Coughlin | Board President | — | ||
| Karen Dispos DeBoos | Secretary | — | ||
| Tom Lavin | Artistic Director | — | ||
| Bob Akey | Board Member | — | ||
| Jayme Keable | Board Member | — | ||
| Jim Calnon | Board Member | — | ||
| Alex Malsan | Board Member | — | ||
| Jane Waldron | Board Member | — | ||
| Pamela Lavin | Board Member | — | ||
| Tracy Vicory-Rosenquest | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 59 points above the peer median (90 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.