Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 2.3% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 7.0% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 5.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 16.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 19.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 16.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SONDRA BIBB Board Member
WINSTON BURNS Board Member
NATHAN GORDON Board Member
THOMAS LAVEIST Board Member
ADONIS ROSE Board Member
WILLIAM ROUSELLE Board President
LAVERN SAULNEY Board Member
DERRICK STROZIER Board Member
KATHLEEN TURNER Board President
CASSIE WORLEY Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH BELL GENERAL MANAGER (PART YEAR) 5.8% of Rev
SUSAN HENRY Executive Director 1.2% of Rev
LATOYA BULLARD-FRANKLIN CHAIRMAN
TERRANCE HUMPHREY Board Member
KATHLEEN TURNER Board Member
WINSTON BURNS Board Member
SONDRA BIBB Artistic Director
ERIKA MCCONDUITT Board Member
WILLIAM ROUSELLE Board President
CASSIE WORLEY Board President
DERRICK STROZIER Treasurer
DR THOMAS LAVEIST Board Member
MICHAEL HECHT Board Member
JAMAR MCKNEELEY Board Member
NATHAN GORDON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 49 other orgs in LA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 12 points above the peer median (45 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 41 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.