Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 6.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 4.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 4.5% 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 11.8% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 13.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 12.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABBY JENNINGS Board Member
ERIN RUSSELL Board Member
DEBBIE DAVIS Board Member
LISA BRUMLEY-HANEY Board Member
RACHELLE MAASS Board Member
CHARLIE MOULTON Board Member
ELIZABETH IRBY Board Member
SARAH MATHEWS Board Member
CATHERINE FOTHERGILL EXECUTIVE DI
ANN PATEL Board President
ALAN BAGLEY VICE PRESIDE
AMANDA O'NEAL Secretary
DR ANDY TERRY Treasurer
MEGAN HALL VICE TREASUR
DR AMY GALDAMEZ Board Member
CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS JOHNSON Board Member
ROSS OWYOUNG Board Member
SUZANNE BABBIE Board Member
JULIE ROBINSON Board Member
ELIZABETH MICHAEL Board Member
MONICA LO Board Member
ANGELA ROWE Board Member
ROBERT O'NEAL Board Member
MICHAL HARRIS Board Member
STACEY SEBREE Board Member
JUSTIN BANK Board Member
MATTHEW SEWELL Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANDY TERRY Treasurer
ELIESE FREEMAN-CRUMLEY Board Member
DR AMY GALDAMEZ Board Member
ROSS OWYOUNG Board Member
AMBER BAGLEY Board Member
ALAN BAGLEY VICE PRESIDE
CHRIS JOHNSON Board Member
JULIE ROBINSON Board Member
ANN PATEL Board President
MEGAN HALL Secretary
BEC DWYER-COOP Board Member
SUZANNE BABBIE Board Member
ELIZABETH MICHAEL Board Member
JUSTIN BANK Board Member
AMANDA O'NEAL Board Member
ROBERT O'NEAL Board Member
ERIN RUSSELL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WENDY SEE Board Member
DR ANDY TERRY Treasurer
KATHRYN BROOKS GORNATTI VICE PRESIDE
BETTY HARRISON Board Member
DRAKE MANN Board Member
SARAH PILCHER Board Member
PATRICIA FARNSWORTH Board President
JENNIE STRANGE Board Member
JEANNE ANSON Secretary
ELIESE FREEMAN-CRUMLEY Board Member
DR DANNY FLETCHER Board Member
DR AMY GALDAMEZ Board Member
ROSS OWYOUNG Board Member
BRIDGETTE FRAZIER Board Member
STACY BELL Board Member
CHRIS JOHNSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 34 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points above the peer median (60 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.