Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
27
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 18.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 17.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 24.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 14.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 16.8% of Rev
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President 0.5% of Rev
JACOB RICHARDS Board President 0.5% of Rev
KAYLA WHITE JR SECTION CHA 0.5% of Rev
SARAH MATTERI Board President 0.4% of Rev
MARK LANGLEY Board President 0.2% of Rev
MARY SHOLLMIER SR SECTION CHA 0.2% of Rev
TERRY HICKS Board President —
JEREMY HALL Board President —
TIFFANIE MANES ALL STATE CHAI —
DREW WARREN Board President —
MAGGIE ASHBURN Board President —
TYLER MORRIS Board President —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 16.4% of Rev
KAYLA WHITE JR SECTION CHA 0.6% of Rev
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President 0.4% of Rev
MARK LANGLEY Board President 0.4% of Rev
TERRY HICKS Board President 0.3% of Rev
DREW WARREN Board President 0.2% of Rev
SARAH MATTERI Board President 0.2% of Rev
CURTIS MINOR Board President —
JEREMY HALL ALL STATE CHAI —
MARY SHOLLMIER SR SECTION CHA —
MAGGIE ASHBURN Board President —
JACOB RICHARDS Board President —
TYLER MORRIS Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 14.3% of Rev
RYAN FOX Board President 0.5% of Rev
JEREMY CARTER Board President 0.4% of Rev
LARRY DUNN Board President 0.3% of Rev
MARK LANGLEY Board President 0.2% of Rev
KEITH REEVES JR SECTION CHA 0.2% of Rev
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President 0.2% of Rev
MAT WHITWORTH Board President —
CURTIS MINOR Board President —
TERRY HICKS ALL STATE CHAI —
EDWARD HAMPTON SR SECTION CHA —
ANDREA HARRIS Board President —
MICHAEL BROWN Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 11.9% of Rev
JEREMY HALL Board President 0.4% of Rev
CYNTHIA OUTLAW Board President 0.4% of Rev
RYAN FOX Board President 0.4% of Rev
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President 0.2% of Rev
MAT WHITWORTH Board President —
CURTIS MINOR Board President —
MARK LANGLEY Board President —
TERRY HICKS ALL STATE CHAI —
KEITH REEVES JR SECTION CHA —
EDWARD HAMPTON SR SECTION CHA —
ANDREA HARRIS Board President —
TIFFANY REEVES Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 8.0% of Rev
THOMAS STREET Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
MAT WHITWORTH Board President —
ANGELA WEAVER Board President —
CURTIS MINOR Board President —
KAYLA ABERNATH ALL STATE CHAI —
KEITH REEVES JR SECTION CHA —
JOHNNY PEOPLES SR SECTION CHA —
JEREMY HALL Board President —
ANDREA HARRIS Board President —
CYNTHIA OUTLAW Board President —
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President —
TIFFANY REEVES Board President —
RYAN FOX Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 44 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (5 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.