Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
27
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 18.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 17.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 24.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 14.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 16.8% of Rev
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President 0.5% of Rev
JACOB RICHARDS Board President 0.5% of Rev
KAYLA WHITE JR SECTION CHA 0.5% of Rev
SARAH MATTERI Board President 0.4% of Rev
MARK LANGLEY Board President 0.2% of Rev
MARY SHOLLMIER SR SECTION CHA 0.2% of Rev
TERRY HICKS Board President
JEREMY HALL Board President
TIFFANIE MANES ALL STATE CHAI
DREW WARREN Board President
MAGGIE ASHBURN Board President
TYLER MORRIS Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 16.4% of Rev
KAYLA WHITE JR SECTION CHA 0.6% of Rev
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President 0.4% of Rev
MARK LANGLEY Board President 0.4% of Rev
TERRY HICKS Board President 0.3% of Rev
DREW WARREN Board President 0.2% of Rev
SARAH MATTERI Board President 0.2% of Rev
CURTIS MINOR Board President
JEREMY HALL ALL STATE CHAI
MARY SHOLLMIER SR SECTION CHA
MAGGIE ASHBURN Board President
JACOB RICHARDS Board President
TYLER MORRIS Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 14.3% of Rev
RYAN FOX Board President 0.5% of Rev
JEREMY CARTER Board President 0.4% of Rev
LARRY DUNN Board President 0.3% of Rev
MARK LANGLEY Board President 0.2% of Rev
KEITH REEVES JR SECTION CHA 0.2% of Rev
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President 0.2% of Rev
MAT WHITWORTH Board President
CURTIS MINOR Board President
TERRY HICKS ALL STATE CHAI
EDWARD HAMPTON SR SECTION CHA
ANDREA HARRIS Board President
MICHAEL BROWN Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 11.9% of Rev
JEREMY HALL Board President 0.4% of Rev
CYNTHIA OUTLAW Board President 0.4% of Rev
RYAN FOX Board President 0.4% of Rev
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President 0.2% of Rev
MAT WHITWORTH Board President
CURTIS MINOR Board President
MARK LANGLEY Board President
TERRY HICKS ALL STATE CHAI
KEITH REEVES JR SECTION CHA
EDWARD HAMPTON SR SECTION CHA
ANDREA HARRIS Board President
TIFFANY REEVES Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI WHITWORT Board Member 8.0% of Rev
THOMAS STREET Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
MAT WHITWORTH Board President
ANGELA WEAVER Board President
CURTIS MINOR Board President
KAYLA ABERNATH ALL STATE CHAI
KEITH REEVES JR SECTION CHA
JOHNNY PEOPLES SR SECTION CHA
JEREMY HALL Board President
ANDREA HARRIS Board President
CYNTHIA OUTLAW Board President
ROY ZIMMERMAN Board President
TIFFANY REEVES Board President
RYAN FOX Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 34 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points below the peer median (5 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.