Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 51.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 17.4% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 11.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 3.6% 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 2.6% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ACHINTA S MCDANIEL Artistic Director 33.4% of Rev
BRIAN ELERDING Executive Director 15.4% of Rev
NATASHA NEUFELD Board President —
JAIKARAN SAWHNY Board President —
ARUN MATHAI Treasurer —
DRE JACKSON Board Member —
MICHAEL GRAHAM Board Member —
ANTHEA BHARGAVA Board Member —
ERIN O'MALLEY Board Member —
SANJANA SEELAM Board Member —
VISHAL UTTAM Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ACHINTA S MCDANIEL Artistic Director 32.6% of Rev
BRIAN ELERDING Executive Director 6.3% of Rev
NATASHA NEUFELD Board President —
JAIKARAN SAWHNY Board President —
ARUN MATHAI Treasurer —
DRE JACKSON Board Member —
MICHAEL GRAHAM Board Member —
ANTHEA BHARGAVA Board Member —
ERIN O'MALLEY Board Member —
SANJANA SEELAM Board Member —
VISHAL UTTAM Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ACHINTA S MCDANIEL Artistic Director 31.8% of Rev
MATTHEW COOK Executive Director 1.1% of Rev
MICHAEL GRAHAM Board Member —
ANTHEA BHARGAVA Board Member —
ERIN O'MALLEY Board Member —
SANJANA SEELAM Board Member —
JAIKARAN SAWHNY Board Member —
VISHAL UTTAM Board Member —
NATASHA NEUFELD Board President —
DRE JACKSON Board President —
ARUN MATHAI Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANCHITA MCDANIEL Executive Dir. 4.4% of Rev
MICHAEL GRAHAM Board Member —
ANDRE JACKSON Board President —
ERIN DWYER Board President —
JAIKARAN SAWHNY Secretary —
ARUN MATHAI Treasurer —
NATASHA NEUFELD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 23 points below the peer median (42 vs. 65).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 51.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.