Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 51.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 17.4% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 11.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 3.6% 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 2.6% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ACHINTA S MCDANIEL Artistic Director 33.4% of Rev
BRIAN ELERDING Executive Director 15.4% of Rev
NATASHA NEUFELD Board President
JAIKARAN SAWHNY Board President
ARUN MATHAI Treasurer
DRE JACKSON Board Member
MICHAEL GRAHAM Board Member
ANTHEA BHARGAVA Board Member
ERIN O'MALLEY Board Member
SANJANA SEELAM Board Member
VISHAL UTTAM Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ACHINTA S MCDANIEL Artistic Director 32.6% of Rev
BRIAN ELERDING Executive Director 6.3% of Rev
NATASHA NEUFELD Board President
JAIKARAN SAWHNY Board President
ARUN MATHAI Treasurer
DRE JACKSON Board Member
MICHAEL GRAHAM Board Member
ANTHEA BHARGAVA Board Member
ERIN O'MALLEY Board Member
SANJANA SEELAM Board Member
VISHAL UTTAM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ACHINTA S MCDANIEL Artistic Director 31.8% of Rev
MATTHEW COOK Executive Director 1.1% of Rev
MICHAEL GRAHAM Board Member
ANTHEA BHARGAVA Board Member
ERIN O'MALLEY Board Member
SANJANA SEELAM Board Member
JAIKARAN SAWHNY Board Member
VISHAL UTTAM Board Member
NATASHA NEUFELD Board President
DRE JACKSON Board President
ARUN MATHAI Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANCHITA MCDANIEL Executive Dir. 4.4% of Rev
MICHAEL GRAHAM Board Member
ANDRE JACKSON Board President
ERIN DWYER Board President
JAIKARAN SAWHNY Secretary
ARUN MATHAI Treasurer
NATASHA NEUFELD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 51.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.