Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Kathleen Leidner | Executive Dir. | 10.5% of Rev | ||
| Daniel LoPilato | Executive Dir. | 8.8% of Rev | ||
| Brendan Farrell | Board President | — | ||
| Joella Guaraglia-Wheeler | Board President | — | ||
| Sierra Reading | Secretary | — | ||
| Sara Niles | Board Member | — | ||
| Debra Brayfindley | Board Member | — | ||
| Fernanda Vanetta | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon Reische | Executive Director | 3.8% of Rev | ||
| Brendan Farrell | Board President | — | ||
| Sierra Reading | Secretary | — | ||
| Victoria Pulsifer | Treasurer | — | ||
| Thomas Gentill | Board Member | — | ||
| Kenneth McLellan | Board Member | — | ||
| Sara Niles | Board Member | — | ||
| Benjamin Reische | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points above the peer median (55 vs. 34).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.