Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
28
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 49 Fragile Recovery
2014 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ESTHER HANSON Board Member
LISA ALEXANDER PRSIDENT
ITHACA MOORE Board President
NICHOLAS CASAGRANDE Treasurer
AMY JIROUT Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TRUDY MCCREANOR EXECUTIVE DI
DAN SPEARS Board Member
LISA ALEXANDER Board President
SANDI LANG Secretary
SHERRYL NIVES Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA FROST Board Member
AMY JIROUT Board Member
TRUDY MCCREANOR EXECUTIVE DI
SANDI LANG Secretary
SHERRYL NIVES Treasurer
DAN SPEARS Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.