Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | 18.3% | 39 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 36 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONIA GRAY | Treasurer | 18.3% of Rev | ||
| DIANA CLARK | Board Member | — | ||
| ABBIE CRIST | Board Member | — | ||
| KATHLEEN DICKSON | Board Member | — | ||
| RICK HOLLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| MARSHALL JONES | Board Member | — | ||
| JOHN PRITCHETT | Secretary | — | ||
| NICK RAIL | Board President | — | ||
| CHRISTIE LYNN RUST | Board Member | — | ||
| LORETTA STONER | Board Member | — | ||
| CANDACE TINKLER | Board Member | — | ||
| SARAH VALLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| LUIS PELAYO ZEPEDA | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIANA CLARK | Board Member | — | ||
| ABBIE CRIST | Board Member | — | ||
| KATHLEEN DICKSON | Board Member | — | ||
| SONIA GRAY | Treasurer | — | ||
| RICK HOLLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| MARSHALL JONES | Board Member | — | ||
| JOHN PRITCHETT | Secretary | — | ||
| NICK RAIL | Board President | — | ||
| CHRISTIE LYNN RUST | Board Member | — | ||
| LORETTA STONER | Board Member | — | ||
| NICOLE STOUT | Board Member | — | ||
| CANDACE TINKLER | Board Member | — | ||
| SARAH VALLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| LUIS PELAYO ZEPEDA | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 20 points below the peer median (45 vs. 65).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 18.3% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.