Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
56
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 56 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 7.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 56 Fragile Recovery
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Recovery
2015 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Andrew J Haines Board President
Thomas Servinsky Board President
Jennifer Savage Secretary
Carol Schroeder Treasurer
Benjamin Enyart Board President
Kimberley Enyart Treasurer
Suzanne Hortsman Executive Director

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John W Enyart Board Member
Benjamin Enyart Board Member
Jeanne Hudock Board Member
Robert Bysshe Board Member
Andrew J Haines Board President
Thomas Servinsky Board President
Jennifer Savage Secretary
Carol Schroeder Treasurer
Linda Reymore Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Linda Reymore Executive Director
John W Enyart Conductor
Benjamin Enyart Conductor
Thomas Servinsky Conductor
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
56 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 50 points above the peer median (80 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.