Programmatic Contraction
What does this mean?
Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.
The Path Forward
The Rainmaker
Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 46 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 40 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Engles | Presidetn Of The Board | — | ||
| Austin Hartel | Executive Director | — | ||
| Maggie Boyette | Board Member | — | ||
| Cameron Lee | Board Member | — | ||
| Christina Lee | Board Member | — | ||
| Megan Watson | Board Member | — | ||
| Emily Lower | Board Member | — | ||
| Emmily Olivefr Ham | Board Member | — | ||
| Thyrsa Da Rosa | Board Member | — | ||
| Maria Engles | Presidetn Of The Board | — | ||
| Austin Hartel | Executive Director | — | ||
| Maggie Boyette | Board Member | — | ||
| Cameron Lee | Board Member | — | ||
| Christina Lee | Board Member | — | ||
| Megan Watson | Board Member | — | ||
| Emily Lower | Board Member | — | ||
| Emmily Olivefr Ham | Board Member | — | ||
| Thyrsa Da Rosa | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (55 vs. 36).
5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction
Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.
Overall score has gone from 40 → 43 over 3 years (improving by 3 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.