Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 46 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Els Bunkens Board President
Kimberly Sena Moore PhD Board President
Paul Slayton Treasurer
Danielle Salerno Secretary
Robert Beane Resident Agent
Estelle Ayomen Board Member
Lester Erich Board Member
Jurnie Jacome Board Member
Kate Koller Board Member
Maria Lakes Board Member
Stephanie Lorenz Board Member
Jill Janda-Kanner Board Member
Stephanie Webb Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Els Bunkens Board President
Kimberly Sena Moore PhD Board President
Paul Slayton Treasurer
Danielle Salerno Secretary
Robert Beane Resident Agent
Estelle Ayomen Board Member
Lester Erich Board Member
Jurnie Jacome Board Member
Kate Koller Board Member
Maria Lakes Board Member
Stephanie Lorenz Board Member
Jill Janda-Kanner Board Member
Stephanie Webb Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jill Janda -Kanner Board President
Els Bunkens Board President
Daniel Davis Secetary
Carla Sledge Treasurer
Robert Beane Board Member
Lester Erich Board Member
Stephanie Webb Board Member
Stephanie Lorenz Board Member
Estelle Ayomen Board Member
Elise Rose Board Member
Emily Clark Board Member
George Poling Board Member
Elwood Smith Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jill Janda-Kanner Board President
Els Bunkens Board President
Daniel Davis Secretary
Carla Sledge Treasurer
Melissa Schaerf Board Member
Lester Erich Board Member
Elise Rose Board Member
Robert Beane Board Member
Stephanie Webb Board Member
Estelle Ayomen Board Member
Emily Clark Board Member
Elwood Smith Board Member
Anthony Contino Board President
Jill-Janda-Kanner Board Member
Jennifer Cox Secretary
Carla Sledge Treasuer
Jean Bersch Board Member
Robert Beane Board Member
Lester Erich Board Member
Harold Kurtz Board Member
Elwood Smith Board Member
Aaron White Board Member
Jason Bahr Board Member
Anne Dalton Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jill Janda-Kanner Board President
Els Bunkins Board President
Daniel Davis Secretary
Carla Sledge Treasurer
Melissa Schaerf Board Member
Lester Erich Board Member
Elise Rose Board Member
Robert Beane Board Member
Stephanie Webb Board Member
Estelle Ayomen Board Member
Emily Clark Board Member
Elwood Smith Board Member
Harold Kurtz Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 25 points above the peer median (55 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.