Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 7.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 11.4% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 17.2% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 12.4% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 14.1% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 12.0% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 13.0% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 12.4% 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 12.9% 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 11.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 16.2% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 16.4% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 6.4% 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Dearden Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
Pamela Dearden Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
TIM INGHAM Board President
RICHARD GOLDSTEIN Board President
SHEILA BECHERT Board President
WILLIAM PENN HOUSE Board Member
MATTHEW BILES Board Member
CHUCK BERGERON Board Member
MARI MENNEL-BELL Board Member
Lynn McFadden Board Member
Chris Roehm Board Member
Roberta Young Treasurer
TIM INGHAM Board President
RICHARD GOLDSTEIN Board President
SHEILA BECHERT Board President
WILLIAM PENN HOUSE Board Member
MATTHEW BILES Board Member
CHUCK BERGERON Board Member
MARI MENNEL-BELL Board Member
Lynn McFadden Board Member
Chris Roehm Board Member
Roberta Young Treasurer

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAM DEARDEN Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
TIM INGHAM Board President
RICHARD GOLDSTEIN Board President
SHEILA BECHERT Board President
ROBERTA YOUNG Treasurer
WILLIAM PENN HOUSE Board Member
MATTHEW BILES Board Member
JAMES MAUS Board Member
CHUCK BERGERON Board Member
ED DECHANT Board Member
MARI MENNEL-BELL Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAM DEARDEN Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
TIM INGHAM Board President
RICHARD GOLDSTEIN Board President
SHEILA BECHERT Board President
KEN WERNER Treasurer
WILLIAM PENN HOUSE Board Member
CHRIS GAMMILL Board Member
JAMES MAUS Board Member
CHUCK BERGERON Board Member
ED DECHANT Board Member
PIETER DE ZWART Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAM DEARDEN Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
PAM DEARDEN Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
TIM INGHAM Board President
RICHARD GOLDSTEIN Board President
WALTER BUZZ LAMB Board President
SHEILA BECHERT Board President
JACK LOVING Board President
ROBERTA YOUNG Treasurer
JAMES MAUS Board Member
HAROLD BUZZ MERRITT Board Member
ED DECHANT Board Member
CHUCK BERGERON Board Member
CAROL ROEHRENBECK Board Member
KEN WERNER Board Member
WILLIAM PENN HOUSE Board Member
TIM INGHAM Board President
RICHARD GOLDSTEIN Board President
SHEILA BECHERT Board President
KEN WERNER Treasurer
WILLIAM PENN HOUSE Board Member
CAROL ROEHRENBECK Board Member
JAMES MAUS Board Member
CHUCK BERGERON Board Member
ED DECHANT Board Member
PIETER DE ZWART Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 48 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.