Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 41.5% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 22.6% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 10.7% 46 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 15.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 13.7% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 12.2% 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 10.5% 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 9.2% 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 9.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 10.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 6.5% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 8.3% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 7.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STACY PAIR Executive Director 15.1% of Rev
WILL SHURLEY Board President
JANICE WILLIAMS Board President
LYNN LOFTON Secretary
JERRY GRIFFITH Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STACY PAIR Executive Director
JOHN MCFARLAND Board President
RICH LIWANAG Board President
CINDY LAMB Secretary
MARIA JOHNSON Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JORDAN WARREN Executive Director 14.0% of Rev
JOHN MCFARLAND Board President
RICH LIWANAG Board President
CINDY LAMB Secretary
MARIA JOHNSON Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 30 other orgs in MS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (5 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 23 over 5 years (declining by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 41.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~39 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.