Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction ↑
Overall
36
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 — — — 38 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 51.0% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 65.1% 15 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 31.1% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 46.0% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — 45.2% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 41.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 37.2% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bryan Fantoni Board President —
Charles Allen Board Member —
Cynthia Alvey Treasurer —
Julie Wunderlin Seretary —
Emily Teaford Board President —
Jennifer Howard Board Member —
Laura Beauford Board Member —
Greer Fischer Board Member —
Terri Foster Executive Director —
Emily Johnson Board Member —
Jennifer Fantoni Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI E FOSTER Artistic Director 69.8% of Rev
LINDSAY RATTERMAN Board Member —
EMORY WILLIAMSON Board Member —
KAREN BOWIE Board Member —
ABIGAIL RILEY Board Member —
KATE BERGER Board Member —
PHIL MARTIN Board President —
BRYAN FANTONI Board President —
ASHTON NAPIER Treasurer —
KAREN STORY Secretary —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI E FOSTER Executive Director 63.8% of Rev
LINDSAY RATTERMAN Board Member —
EMORY WILLIAMSON Board Member —
KAREN BOWIE Board Member —
ABIGAIL RILEY Board Member —
KATE BERGER Board Member —
BRYAN FANTONI Board President —
PHIL MARTIN Board President —
KAREN STORY Secretary —
ASHTON NAPIER Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI E FOSTER Artistic Director 97.4% of Rev
BRYAN FANTONI Board President —
PHIL MARTIN Board President —
KAREN STORY Secretary —
ASHTON NAPIER Treasurer —
LINDSAY RATTERMAN Board Member —
EMORY WILLIAMSON Board Member —
KAREN BOWIE Board Member —
ABIGAIL RILEY Board Member —
ERICA WARREN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 92 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points below the peer median (30 vs. 54).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.