Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA CLEMENTS Officer
REBECCA FULLER Board President
SAGE GALLAGHER Officer
JENNIFER ROBERTS Officer
ASHLY BARACLOUGH Dancer Rep
WENDI SMITH Secretary
JARED HANCOCK Officer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH REYNOLDS CONTRACT DIR
BETTE ARIAL OFFICER
BARB CHRISTENSEN Board President
LISA CLEMENTS OFFICER
SHANNON DAVIDSON Treasurer
KIMBALL FORBES LEGAL REP
REBECCA FULLER Secretary
SAGE GALLAGHER Board President
MICHELE SAUNDERS OFFICER
SHERLYNN DAVIS EXECUTIVE DI
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 81 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points below the peer median (15 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.