Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
46
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 20.2% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 250.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 12.5% 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 27.1% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 18.3% 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 21.2% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 19.9% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 16.2% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 53 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDY WESTBROOK Executive Dir. 20.2% of Rev
KATHERINE RHODUS Board President
STEVE GILLESPIE Board President
BRENDA UNDERWOOD Treasurer
BRENDA STRATMAN Secretary
RANDY WESTBROOK Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDY WESTBROOK Board Member 17.2% of Rev
STEVE GILLESPIE Board President
TERESA TOPE Board President
DEBRA NEAL Treasurer
PATTI BAKER Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RANDY WESTBROOK Board Member 17.4% of Rev
STEVE GILLESPIE Board President
TERESA TOPE Board President
DEBRA NEAL Treasurer
PATTI BAKER Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 56 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (60 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.