Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 42.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 38.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMBER TURNER THEATRE DIRE 36.7% of Rev
LYNNE GILCREASE Board President
JOSHUA RITCHIE Secretary
DR WILLIAM LEONARD Board Member
ALICE WADDELL Board Member
ALLIE THOMAS Board Member
CHAD SMITH Treasurer
GRACIE DAVIS Board Member
BRETT RILEY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMBER TURNER THEATRE DIRE 36.7% of Rev
LYNNE GILCREASE Board President
JOSHUA RITCHIE Secretary
DR WILLIAM LEONARD Board Member
ALICE WADDELL Board Member
DEREK GREGORY VICE PRESIDE
CHAD SMITH Treasurer
GINNY HENDERSON Board Member
BRETT RILEY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 55 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points below the peer median (15 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 37 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.