Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 42 Fragile Recovery
2013 14.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 13.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NANCY ARGANBRIGHT Board Member
CATHERINE BAUERLE Board Member
ROOSWVELT HARRIS DHSC Board Member
CHARLES COMBOPIANO HON DM Board Member
JULIUS ERLENBACH Board Member
SUE FILLION Board Member
GREGORY FRITZE Board Member
SANDRA K GOSCH PAST PRESIDE
BETTY HODKINSON Board Member
DR LORETHA KING Board Member
JOHN ZAK III MD Board Member
SHIRLEY OKHOVATIAN Treasurer
BRANDON PERRY Board Member
HEATHER PETIT-JOHNSON Artistic Director
JOHN R PHELPS Board Member
CHRISTINE SENO VICE PRESIDE
LOU SENO Board Member
DORI SOUKUP Board Member
MAGGIE THOMPSON Secretary
DR DALLAS WEEKLEY Board Member
MARGARET YAEGER Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NANCY ARGANBRIGHT Board Member
CATHERINE BAUERLE Board Member
CHARLES COMBOPIANO HON DM Board Member
JULIUS ERLENBACH Board Member
SUE FILLION Board Member
GREGORY FRITZE Board Member
SANDRA K GOSCH PAST PRESIDE
LYNDA HODGSON Board Member
BETTY HODKINSON Board Member
LOIS CLARK LOESCH Board Member
JOHN ZAK III MD Board Member
SHIRLEY OKHOVATIAN Treasurer
BRANDON PERRY Board Member
JOHN R PHELPS Board Member
CHRISTINE SENO VICE PRESIDE
MAGGIE THOMPSON Secretary
DR DALLAS WEEKLEY Artistic Director
MARGARET YAEGER Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NANCY ARGANBRIGHT Board Member
CATHERINE BAUERLE Board Member
CHARLES COMBOPIANO HON DM Board Member
ROSE GRACE DMA Board Member
JULIUS ERLENBACH Board Member
SUE FILLION Board Member
GREGORY FRITZE Board Member
SANDRA K GOSCH PAST PRESIDE
LYNDA HODGSON Board Member
BETTY HODKINSON Board Member
LUCY JACKMAN Board Member
LOIS CLARK LOESCH Board Member
BERT J MEINE Board Member
GINA MILLAR Board Member
SHIRLEY OKHOVATIAN Treasurer
BRANDON PERRY Board Member
DOUGLAS PETERSON Board President
JOHN R PHELPS Board Member
CHRISTINE SENO GUILD PRESID
DEB SMITH Board Member
MAGGIE THOMPSON Secretary
KATHY TOMPROS Board Member
DR DALLAS WEEKLEY Artistic Director
PAMELA C WILKINS VICE PRESIDE
MARGARET YAEGER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 41 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.