Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 21.0% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — 19.6% 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 6.7% 40 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 8.8% 40 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 10.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 10.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 11.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 11.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMMA MILLS BLEDSOE Board President —
MARSHA JOYNER VICE PRESIDE —
LAUREN TEMPLETON Secretary —
VICKI HARNAGE Treasurer —
HUGH WILLIAMS Board Member —
SHARON LENNON Board Member —
JEANNE CONNER Board Member —
ANNE COONROD Board Member —
BETH IVINS Board Member —
KATHLEEN MINDER Treasurer —
NICK KRAWIECKI Board Member —
NANCY BARTMESS Board Member —
CARRIE ANDERSON MAYS Board Member —
IRENE SANCHEZ Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUE BRADDOCK Board President —
JEANNE CONNER Board Member —
ANNE COONROD VICE PRESIDE —
MARSHA JOYNER Board Member —
NICK KRAWIECKI Board Member —
SHARON LENNON Board Member —
KATHLEEN MINDER Treasurer —
TOM PIPPIN Board Member —
LAUREN TEMPLETON Secretary —
HUGH WILLIAMS Board Member —
VICKI WHITTEMORE Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIC SAKURAI EXECUTIVE DI 8.6% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER REX Board Member 6.2% of Rev
EMMA BLEDSOE Board President —
SUE BRADDOCK Secretary —
BARBARA ALLEVA GANT Board Member —
ANNE TAYLOR HENSLEY Board Member —
MARSHA JOYNER Board Member —
SHARON LENNON Board Member —
KATHLEEN MINDER Treasurer —
TOM PIPPIN Board Member —
IRENE SANCHEZ VICE PRESIDE —
VICKI WHITTEMORE Board Member —
HUGH WILLIAMS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIC SAKURAI EXECUTIVE DI 8.6% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER REX Board Member 6.2% of Rev
EMMA BLEDSOE Board President —
SUE BRADDOCK Secretary —
BARBARA ALLEVA GANT Board Member —
ANNE TAYLOR HENSLEY Board Member —
MARSHA JOYNER Board Member —
SHARON LENNON Board Member —
KATHLEEN MINDER Treasurer —
TOM PIPPIN Board Member —
IRENE SANCHEZ VICE PRESIDE —
VICKI WHITTEMORE Board Member —
HUGH WILLIAMS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMMA BLEDSOE Board President —
SUE BRADDOCK Secretary —
BARBARA ALLEVA GRANT Board Member —
SHARON LENNON Board Member —
KATHLEEN MINDER Treasurer —
TOM PIPPIN Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER REX Board Member —
ERIC SAKURAI EXECUTIVE DI —
IRENE SANCHEZ VICE PRESIDE —
VICKI WHITTEMORE Board Member —
HUGH WILLIAMS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 477 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.