Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERESA WILKINS Secretary 7.5% of Rev
LINDA JOHNSON Board President
JOAN JENNINGS Board President
THOMAS KIDWELL Board Member
RUTH BANTHER Board Member
MICHAEL BOCCUTI Board Member
JAN CAUSEY Board Member
ERIC W CLARK Board Member
EDWARD HOFFMAN Board Member
BARBARA HUBBARD Board Member
CARRIE ROOT Board Member
RODRIGO DAVIS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA HUBBARD Board Member 43.3% of Rev
RODRIGO DAVIS Board Member 42.6% of Rev
VONDA WOODS Treasurer 35.7% of Rev
TERESA WILKINS Secretary 24.9% of Rev
LINDA JOHNSON Board President
JOAN JENNINGS Board President
THOMAS KIDWELL Board Member
RUTH BANTHER Board Member
MICHAEL BOCCUTI Board Member
JAN CAUSEY Board Member
ERIC W CLARK Board Member
EDWARD HOFFMAN Board Member
CARRIE ROOT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 49 → 45 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.