Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LUIS ALVAREZ Board Member
KRISTY DELL Board Member
ARIELLE MUDD Board President
SALMA FATHALLA Board President
LOLITA LANDERS Board President
LUCY THOMPSON Board President
DONNA ROZELL Board President
KAYLEEN MUELLER Treasurer
LORI KESSEL Treasurer
ANN MARIE VAZQUEZ Secretary
AMY RATLIFF Board President
NATASHA SANTIAGO Secretary
LOLITA LANDERS Board President
JESSICA SHERMAN Secretary
ARIELLE MUDD Treasurer
DONNA ROZELL Board President
VICKIE CASTRO Treasurer
LORI KESSEL Treasurer
ANN MARIE VAZQUEZ Secretary
AMY RATLIFF Board President
LOLITA LANDERS Board President
JESSICA SHERMAN Secretary
ARIELLE MUDD Treasurer
DONNA ROZELL Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6,922 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix B1.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.