Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
47
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 15.9% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 13.5% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 12.2% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 18.1% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 12.2% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 2.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 1.3% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 9.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 9.9% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 10.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 11.1% 51 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 — — 19.6% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 9.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TANIA CASTROVERDE MOSKALENKO Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
SHANNON RODDY Board President 4.1% of Rev
KELLI MALDONADO Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
GERALD BILLER Board Member —
CHAD CAMPBELL Board Member —
MARK FAMIGLIO Board Member —
EILEEN KAMERICK Board Member —
DAVID KOFFMAN Board Member —
LING MARKOVITZ Board Member —
JAMES MATRAS Board Member —
DR JOHN MAUPIN Board Member —
KARL NEWKIRK Board Member —
DRAYTON SAUNDERS Board Member —
NANCY WEAVER Board Member —
MICHAEL WILSON Board Member —
VERN CHALFANT Treasurer —
JAMES TRAVERS Board President —
DR JENNE BRITELL Board President —
JULIE HARRIS Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHERYL MENDELSON Executive Director 6.4% of Rev
SASHA HAUSMAN DIR. OF ADVANCEMENT 2.5% of Rev
GERALD BILLER Board Member —
CHAD CAMPBELL Board Member —
MARK FAMIGLIO Board Member —
SHARON HILLSTROM Board Member —
MICHELE HOOPER Board Member —
DR JAIH JACKSON Board Member —
DAVID KOFFMAN Board Member —
MICHAEL MARTELLA Board Member —
DR JOHN MAUPIN Board Member —
KARL NEWKIRK Board Member —
ROCHELLE NIGRI Board Member —
WALT PEARSON Board Member —
DRAYTON SAUNDERS Board Member —
NANCI ROSS-WEAVER Board Member —
CHARLES WILSON Board Member —
MICHAEL WILSON Board Member —
JAMES TRAVERS Board President —
DR JENNE BRITELL Board President —
VERN CHALFANT Treasurer —
JULIE HARRIS Secretary —
LAURA HENNESSEY COO —
MARK COLE CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHERYL MENDELSON Executive Director 6.0% of Rev
TRACEY BEEKER Board Member 2.4% of Rev
SASHA HAUSMAN Board Member 2.3% of Rev
ALI BAHAJ Board Member —
GERALD BILLER Board Member —
CHAD CAMPBELL Board Member —
MARK FAMIGLIO Board Member —
SHARON HILLSTROM Board Member —
MICHELE HOOPER Board Member —
DR JAIH JACKSON Board Member —
DAVID KOFFMAN Board Member —
MICHAEL MARTELLA Board Member —
DR JOHN MAUPIN Board Member —
ELAINE MCCLURE Board Member —
KARL NEWKIRK Board Member —
ROCHELLE NIGRI Board Member —
WALT PEARSON Board Member —
DRAYTON SAUNDERS Board Member —
NANCI ROSS-WEAVER Board Member —
CHARLES WILSON Board Member —
MICHAEL WILSON Board Member —
JAMES TRAVERS Board President —
JENNE BRITELL Board President —
VERN CHALFANT Treasurer —
JULIE HARRIS Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 478 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.