Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 8.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 28.6% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 26.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 26.3% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 19.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 20.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 11.4% 42 Fragile Recovery
2015 10.0% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 13.4% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 14.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 16.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELYSIA DAWN Board Member 30.5% of Rev
GREGG ZAVODNY Board President
BRIAN MCGINNIS Treasurer
MATTHEW RILEY VICE PRESIDE
JENNIFER O'DELL Board Member
DARIA WALLACH Board Member
SUSAN VAIL Board Member
MARK NERENHAUSEN Board Member
BRIDGET PATERNO Secretary

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GREGG ZAVODNY Board President
KEN WESTPHAL Treasurer
MATTHEW RILEY VICE PRESIDE
JENNIFER O'DELL Board Member
BRIAN MCGINNIS Board Member
BRIDGET PATERNO Board Member
DARIA WALLACH Board Member
SUSAN VAIL Board Member
MARK NERENHAUSEN Board Member
LAURA ALEXANDER Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA BURNS EXECUTIVE DI 28.7% of Rev
GREGG ZAVODNY Board President
SUZETTE FERNANDEZ Treasurer
LAURA ALEXANDER Secretary
MATTHEW RILEY PAST PRESIDE
JENIFER O'DELL Board Member
DENNIS GOODMAN VICE PRESIDE
DARYL BERG Board Member
ALYSSA HANEY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA BURNS EXECUTIVE DI 29.8% of Rev
ALYSSA HANEY Board President
GREGG ZAVODNY VICE PRESIDE
SUZETTE FERNANDEZ Treasurer
MARIANNE LAMBERTSON Secretary
MATTHEW RILEY PAST PRESIDE
JENIFER O'DELL Board Member
DENNIS GOODMAN Board Member
DANIEL MCDERMOTT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA BURNS EXECUTIVE DI 30.8% of Rev
LAURA BURNS EXECUTIVE DI 29.7% of Rev
MATTHEW RILEY Board Member
CHAD JENSEN PAST PRESIDE
ANN HORTON Board Member
JOHN LOSCUITO Treasurer
SUSAN SIKUTA Secretary
BETSY BRIDGEWATER VICE PRESIDE
JILL BECKMAN Board Member
ALYSSA HANEY Board President
JENNIFER O'DELL Board Member
SKIP PARDEE Board Member
MARIANNCE LAMBERTSON Board Member
MATTHEW RILEY Board President
BETSY BRIDGEWATER VICE PRESIDE
JOHN LOSCUITO Treasurer
SUSAN SIKUTA Secretary
CHAD JENSEN PAST PRESIDE
KAREN BEATTY Board Member
HEATHER DONLAN Board Member
DENNIS GOODMAN Board Member
ALYSSA HANEY Board Member
ANN HORTON Board Member
MARIANNE LAMBERTSON Board Member
DANIEL MCDERMOTT Board Member
JENNIFER O'DELL Board Member
SKIP PARDEE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points below the peer median (0 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.