Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
46
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 28.9% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 10.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 16.8% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 5.3% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 8.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 11.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 23.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 19.8% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 19.5% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 19.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2013 17.3% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 23.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2011 21.9% 39 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA HARMS OPERATIONS & MARKETING 17.7% of Rev
Irene Zafferes ADMINISTRATOR 11.2% of Rev
BARBARA PARKER Board President
ED HOOFNAGLE Board Member
MIKE TOLBERT Vice President
LYNDA HAMLETT Secretary
LINDA KEENE Board Member
SAMUEL SHULHOF Treasurer
PAOLO RAPIZZI Board Member
SALLY BETH STEINER Board Member
KIMBERLY DIVITO Board Member
ELIZABETH MORGAN Board Member
ANDREA DERRICK Board Member
JENI BOND Board Member
DAVID SCHAFFER Board Member
KRISTA CAPO Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Irene Zafferes ADMINISTRATOR 9.6% of Rev
Irene Zafferes ADMINISTRATOR 7.7% of Rev
BARBARA PARKER Board Member
CAITLIN JAMMO Board Member
LARRY GERWIG Board Member
ED HOOFNAGLE Board Member
MIKE TOLBERT Vice President
NATALIE SCOTT Board Member
LINDA KEENE Board Member
MARK PETERMAN Board Member
SAMUEL SHULHOF Board Member
ADRIAN THOMAS Board Member
LINDA NEWTON Board Member
ROBERTA ROMEO Board Member
BARBARA PARKER Board Member
CAITLIN JAMMO Board Member
LARRY GERWIG Board Member
ED HOOFNAGLE Board Member
MIKE TOLBERT Vice President
NATALIE SCOTT Board Member
LINDA KEENE Board Member
MARK PETERMAN Board Member
SAMUEL SHULHOF Board Member
ADRIAN THOMAS Board Member
LINDA NEWTON Board Member
ROBERTA ROMEO Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Irene Zafferes ADMINISTRATOR 7.2% of Rev
BARBARA PARKER Board Member
CAITLIN JAMMO Board Member
LARRY GERWIG Board Member
ED HOOFNAGLE Board Member
MIKE TOLBERT Vice President
NATALIE SCOTT Board Member
LINDA KEENE Board Member
MARK PETERMAN Board Member
SAMUEL SHULHOF Board Member
ADRIAN THOMAS Board Member
LINDA NEWTON Board Member
ROBERTA ROMEO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 48 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (50 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.