Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 28.9% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 — — 10.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 16.8% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — 5.3% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 8.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 11.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 23.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 19.8% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 19.5% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 19.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 17.3% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 23.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 21.9% 39 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA HARMS OPERATIONS & MARKETING 17.7% of Rev
Irene Zafferes ADMINISTRATOR 11.2% of Rev
BARBARA PARKER Board President —
ED HOOFNAGLE Board Member —
MIKE TOLBERT Vice President —
LYNDA HAMLETT Secretary —
LINDA KEENE Board Member —
SAMUEL SHULHOF Treasurer —
PAOLO RAPIZZI Board Member —
SALLY BETH STEINER Board Member —
KIMBERLY DIVITO Board Member —
ELIZABETH MORGAN Board Member —
ANDREA DERRICK Board Member —
JENI BOND Board Member —
DAVID SCHAFFER Board Member —
KRISTA CAPO Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Irene Zafferes ADMINISTRATOR 9.6% of Rev
Irene Zafferes ADMINISTRATOR 7.7% of Rev
BARBARA PARKER Board Member —
CAITLIN JAMMO Board Member —
LARRY GERWIG Board Member —
ED HOOFNAGLE Board Member —
MIKE TOLBERT Vice President —
NATALIE SCOTT Board Member —
LINDA KEENE Board Member —
MARK PETERMAN Board Member —
SAMUEL SHULHOF Board Member —
ADRIAN THOMAS Board Member —
LINDA NEWTON Board Member —
ROBERTA ROMEO Board Member —
BARBARA PARKER Board Member —
CAITLIN JAMMO Board Member —
LARRY GERWIG Board Member —
ED HOOFNAGLE Board Member —
MIKE TOLBERT Vice President —
NATALIE SCOTT Board Member —
LINDA KEENE Board Member —
MARK PETERMAN Board Member —
SAMUEL SHULHOF Board Member —
ADRIAN THOMAS Board Member —
LINDA NEWTON Board Member —
ROBERTA ROMEO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Irene Zafferes ADMINISTRATOR 7.2% of Rev
BARBARA PARKER Board Member —
CAITLIN JAMMO Board Member —
LARRY GERWIG Board Member —
ED HOOFNAGLE Board Member —
MIKE TOLBERT Vice President —
NATALIE SCOTT Board Member —
LINDA KEENE Board Member —
MARK PETERMAN Board Member —
SAMUEL SHULHOF Board Member —
ADRIAN THOMAS Board Member —
LINDA NEWTON Board Member —
ROBERTA ROMEO Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 292 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 37 points below the peer median (42 vs. 79).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.