Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.1% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 8.3% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 5.0% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 8.9% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 4.7% 45 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 9.5% 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 17.3% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 14.7% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 10.4% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 9.9% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 10.5% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 6.2% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNE B KERR Board President 51.1% of Rev
V TERRY DENNIS Treasurer 37.2% of Rev
DR JEREMY MARTIN Board President 18.9% of Rev
DR H ALEXANDER RICH Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
LYNDA BUCK Board President
PEGGY MCKEEL Secretary
CHUCK FOSS Treasurer
ASHLEY GIBSON BARNETT Board Member
SONJI CANEY Board Member
JINX CHANEY Board Member
DOROTHY JENKINS Board Member
J WILLIAM MEEK III Board Member
TWANA RICHARD Board Member
PHILLIP WALKER Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANNE KERR Board President 52.2% of Rev
V TERRY DENNIS Treasurer 35.6% of Rev
DR H ALEXANDER RICH Executive Director 14.9% of Rev
LYNDA BUCK Board President
PEGGY MCKEEL Secretary
CHUCK FOSS Treasurer
ASHLEY GIBSON BARNETT Board Member
SONJI CANEY Board Member
JINX CHANEY Board Member
DOROTHY JENKINS Board Member
J WILLIAM MEEK III Board Member
TWANA RICHARD Board Member
PHILLIP WALKER Board Member
KATHY POU Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANNE KERR Board President 56.6% of Rev
V TERRY DENNIS Treasurer 32.4% of Rev
DR H ALEXANDER RICH Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
LYNDA BUCK Board President
LEE JACKSON Treasurer
PEGGY MCKEEL Secretary
JINX CHANEY Board Member
CHUCK FOSS Board Member
DOROTHY JENKINS Board Member
J WILLIAM MEEK III Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANNE KERR Board President 56.5% of Rev
V TERRY DENNIS Treasurer 31.4% of Rev
DR H ALEXANDER RICH Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
LYNDA BUCK Board President
LEE JACKSON Treasurer
PEGGY MCKEEL Secretary
JINX CHANEY Board Member
CHUCK FOSS Board Member
DOROTHY JENKINS Board Member
J WILLIAM MEEK III Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANNE KERR Board President 51.4% of Rev
V TERRY DENNIS Treasurer 28.3% of Rev
CLAIRE OROLOGAS Executive Director 8.4% of Rev
H ALEXANDER RICH Executive Director 6.4% of Rev
LYNDA BUCK Board President
SARAH MCKAY Secretary
LEE JACKSON Treasurer
PEGGY MCKEEL Secretary
J WILLIAM MEEK III Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 23 points above the peer median (60 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.