Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 — — 57.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — — 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 65 Stable Stable Watch
2011 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Greenwood Executive Director 57.3% of Rev
Margaret Looney Board President —
Theresa Bradley Board President —
Ellen Best Treasurer —
Monica Sangman Secretary —
Elizabeth Ann Dalton Board Member —
Tim Ford Board Member —
Shelia Ford Board Member —
Dianne Leonhardt Board Member —
Nancy King Board Member —
Susan Maxon Board Member —
Amanda Meyer Board Member —
Jennifer Patterson Board Member —
Janet Spaulding Board Member —
Tina Board Member —
Chris Wages Board Member —
Diane Coward Board Member —
Alina Zingleman Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Greenwood Executive Director 57.7% of Rev
Margaret Looney Board President —
Theresa Bradley Board President —
Alina Zingleman Treasurer —
Monica Sangman Secretary —
Elizabeth Ann Dalton Board Member —
Tim Ford Board Member —
Shelia Ford Board Member —
Dianne Leonhardt Board Member —
Nancy King Board Member —
Susan Maxon Board Member —
Amanda Meyers Board Member —
Jennifer Patterson Board Member —
Janet Spaulding Board Member —
Tina Board Member —
Chris Wages Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN MCDOWELL PAST PRESIDE —
ROBIN CORRENTI Treasurer —
GINNY GREENWOOD Board Member —
NANCY YANCEY Board Member —
PEPPER PETTIT Board Member —
ANN BRASWELL Board Member —
JANE WILSON Board Member —
SUE WELLS Secretary —
JIM ATWOOD Board Member —
JENNY SCHNEIDER Board Member —
SHIRLEY HAWKINS Board President —
JIM EATON Board President —
SAMANTHA HEWITT Board Member —
MARIANA STONE Board Member —
NANCY SHAFFMAN Board Member —
JIM BAILEY Board Member —
CARLA BOUTIN Board Member —
JIM EATON Board President —
SHIRLEY HAWKINS Board President —
DIANE COWART Board Member —
JOANNE CULLITY Board Member —
MARGARET LOONEY Board Member —
NANCY KING Board Member —
DIANNE LEONHARDT Board Member —
TINA SANT Board Member —
CHRIS WAGES Board Member —
ELIZABETH ANN DALTON Board President —
JANET SPAULDING Board Member —
ROBIN CORRENTI Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM EATON Board President —
SHIRLEY HAWKINS Board President —
JIM BAILEY Treasurer —
SUE WELLS Secretary —
JIM ATWOOD Board Member —
ANN BRASWELL Board Member —
JENNY SCHNEIDER Board Member —
STACI SCHAFFMAN Board Member —
DIANE COWART Board Member —
ALLIE DEAN Board Member —
DIANE HOUSER Board Member —
MARGARET LOONEY Board Member —
SAMANTHA HEWLETT Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 35 points below the peer median (42 vs. 77).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 57.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.