Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 13.9% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 35 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 35 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF ARNAL Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
ROB PULLEYN Board President —
MICHAEL MANES Board President —
CURT CLONINGER Secretary —
TERESA SWAN TUITE Treasurer —
RALPH BURNS Board Member —
DONALD CARSON Board Member —
RICHARD CHESS Board Member —
MARCIA R COHEN Board Member —
BLAISE DEFRANCEAUX Board Member —
HEDY FISCHER Board Member —
GRANT HENEGAN Board Member —
LEIGH MAHER Board Member —
DAVE PEIFER Board Member —
CHERRY LENTZ SAENGER Board Member —
MARY HOLDEN THOMPSON Board Member —
AMANDA WILES Board Member —
NAN ZANDER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF ARNAL Executive Director 3.4% of Rev
ALICE SEBRELL Board Member 2.3% of Rev
RICHARD CHESS Board Member —
HEDY FISCHER Board Member —
JOHN BYRD Board Member —
MARY H THOMPSON Board Member —
CHERRY L SAENGER Board Member —
NAN ZANDER Board Member —
MATT CHAMBERS Board Member —
BLAISE DEFRANCEAUX Board Member —
LEIGH MAHER Board Member —
DONALD CARSON Board Member —
CONNIE BOSTIC Board Member —
DAVE PEIFER Board Member —
HELGA BEAM Board Member —
AMANDA WILES Board Member —
MARCIA COHEN Board Member —
TERESA S TUITE Treasurer —
MICHAEL MANES Board President —
ROB PULLEYN Board President —
CURT CLONINGER Secretary —
SYDNEY GREEN Board President —
MAYA ROSENBAUM EMPLOYEE —
CARISSA E PFEIFFER EMPLOYEE —
KIMBERLY ENGLISH EMPLOYEE —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL MANES Board Member —
RICHARD CHESS Board Member —
HEDY FISCHER Board Member —
JOHN BYRD Board Member —
BARRY FRIEDLANDER Board Member —
MARY H THOMPSON Board Member —
TERESA S TUITE Board Member —
NAN ZANDER Board Member —
MARILYN LAUFER Board Member —
JOSEPH PEARSON Board Member —
CAROL PENNELL Board Member —
CHERRY L SAENGER Board Member —
ROB PULLEYN Board Member —
DAVE PEIFER Board Member —
ALICE SEBRELL Board Member —
CURT CLONINGER Board Member —
HELGA BEAM Board Member —
MARY L KOTZ Board Member —
CONNIE BOSTIC Board Member —
MARCIA COHEN BOARD MEMER —
ANDY SCOTT Board Member —
LEIGH MAHER Board Member —
AMANDA WILES Secretary —
TODD FOWLER Treasurer —
SYDNEY GREEN Board President —
DON CARSON CO CHAIRMAN —
CARISSA E PFEIFFER EMPLOYEE —
KATHERINE I AVERETT EMPLOYEE —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 96 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 33 points below the peer median (50 vs. 83).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.