Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 64 Stable Stable Watch
2023 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 64 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 62 Stable Stable Watch
2019 — — — 46 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 53 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carolyn Bowers Board President —
Maureen Morgan Secretary —
Marie Hylden Board President —
Brenda Langley Board President —
Donna Toney Board President —
Susan Morrow Treasurer —
Martha Smither Board President —
Jim Dixon Board President —
Molly Crawshaw Board President —
Jim McKeand Board President —
Sandy Johansen Board President —
Heidi Hilbert Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA TONEY Board President —
CAROLYN BOWERS Vice President —
MAUREEN MORGAN Secretary —
SUSAN MORROW Treasurer —
SUZANNE KUCH Treasurer —
JIM GIFFORD Board President —
JIM KELLY Vice President —
ELAINE WEETER Vice President —
JIM DIXON Vice President —
MOLLY CRANSHAW Vice President —
JIM MCKEAND Vice President —
PATRICIA SHAHA Vice President —
BERTHA GIANULIS Vice President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM KELLY Vice President —
MAUREEN MORGAN Secretary —
DONNA WALDRIP Treasurer —
PAST PRESIDENT Board President —
JIM GIFFORD Board President —
CAROLYN BOWERS Vice President —
SUZANNE KUCH Treasurer —
ELAINE WEETER DEVELOPMENT —
JIM DIXON MEMB RECRUIT —
MOLLY CRAWSHAW MEMB SERVICE —
PRISCILLA OMALLEY MEMB SERVCIE —
JIM MCKEAND Vice President —
Jim Gifford Board President —
Carolyn Bowers Vice President —
Maureen Morgan Secretary —
Suzanne Kuch Treasurer —
Suzanne Babbie Board President —
Jim Kelly Vice President —
Elaine Weeter Vice President —
Jim Dixon Vice President —
Molly Crawshaw Vice President —
Priscilla OMalley Vice President —
Jim McKeand Vice President —
Donna Toney Vice President —
Pat Shaha Vice President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM GIFFORD Board President —
MAUREEN MORGAN Secretary —
DONNA WALDROP YEARBY Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 60 points above the peer median (100 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.