Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 52 Fragile Recovery
2023 40 Fragile Recovery
2022 22.7% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 140.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 4.6% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 3.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN AUSTIN Board Member
JAMES BAUDOIN Treasurer
CARRIE BLAIR Board Member
RENEE BRESLER Board Member
NINA BROWN Board Member
KRISTINE CANDLER VICE PRESIDE
ELIZABETH CREECH Board Member
CAROLE FUTRELLE Board President
CRIS HEDGPETH Board Member
KEN KOLB Board Member
JUDITH PATRICK Secretary
KATINKA REMUS Board Member
GYPSY RICHARDSON Board Member
JANE ROBERTSON Board Member
MARY BETH SHUMATE Board Member
MIKE STEWART Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES FELLENBAUM Board Member 9.7% of Rev
DUSTY CAMPBELL Board Member 8.7% of Rev
JAMES FELLENBAUM Board Member 8.1% of Rev
DUSTY CAMPBELL Board Member 7.7% of Rev
KRISTINE CANDLER Treasurer 1.0% of Rev
RENEE BRESLER Board Member
GLENN COCKERHAM Board President
LESLIE COLE Board Member
CAROLE FUTRELLE VICE PRESIDE
JAN HART Board Member
LARRY LOHR Board Member
ELIZABETH MASON Board Member
MICHAEL MCLAIN Board Member
JUDY PATRICK Secretary
MARY BETH SHUMATE Board Member
DON WAUCHOPE Board Member
RENEE BRESLER Board Member
KRISTINE CANDLER Treasurer
GLENN COCKERHAM Board President
LESLIE COLE Board Member
CAROLE FUTRELLE VICE PRESIDE
JAN HART Board Member
LARRY LOHR Board Member
ELIZABETH MASON Board Member
MICHAEL MCLAIN Board Member
JUDY PATRICK Secretary
MARY BETH SHUMATE Board Member
DON WAUCHOPE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAN HART Board Member
CAROLE FUTRELLE Board Member
JAMES FELLENBAUM Artistic Director
LARRY LOHR Board Member
DON WAUCHOPE Board Member
MARY BETH SHUMATE Board Member
MICHAEL MCLAIN Board Member
LESLIE COLE Board Member
ELIZABETH MASON Board Member
RENEE BRESLER Board Member
DUSTY CAMPBELL Board Member
KRISTINE CANDLER Treasurer
GLENN COCKERHAM Board President
JUDITH PATRICK Secretary
JOAN BARHAM Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DUSTY CAMPBELL Board Member 5.9% of Rev
GLENN COCKERHAM Board President
KRISTINE CANDLER Treasurer
JOAN BARHAM Board President
JUDITH PATRICK Secretary
ELIZABETH MASON Board Member
RENEE BRESLER Board Member
LESLIE COLE Board Member
JAMES FELLENBAUM Artistic Director
CAROLE FUTRELLE Board Member
JAN HART Board Member
LARRY LOHR Board Member
MICHAEL MCLAIN Board Member
MARY BETH SHUMATE Board Member
DON WAUCHOPE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.