Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
54
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 37.3% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH MCALINN ADMINISTRATO 37.3% of Rev
JACKIE DIRSCHERL Board Member —
JAN DOCKENDORF Board Member —
WILLIAM L GETTYS Treasurer —
MARY JO LAPORTE Secretary —
TOD M LEAVEN Board Member —
REVEREND WILLIAM E SMITH Board President —
MARCIE STUTZMAN VICE PRESIDE —
LESLIE WELKER Board Member —
JESSICA RUGH FRANTZ Board Member —
KYM VERHOVSHEK Board Member —
POLLY FIETZINGER Board Member —
MARILYNNE HERBERT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VALERIE POULLETTE ALTMAN Board President —
MARILYNNE HERBERT VICE PRESIDE —
RICHARD SMITH Treasurer —
MARY HOLMES Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 222 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (80 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 37.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~31 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.