Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | — | 54 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elaine Sessoms | Board President | — | ||
| Sanna Laird | Board President | — | ||
| Robert Roach | Treasurer | — | ||
| Sarah Martell | Secretary | — | ||
| Amber Pennington | Board Member | — | ||
| April Garner | Board Member | — | ||
| Lee Sessoms | Board Member | — | ||
| Ryan Holden | Board Member | — | ||
| Lori Forster | Board Member | — | ||
| Elizabeth Murphy | Board Member | — | ||
| Bradley Sullivan | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elaine Sessoms | Board President | — | ||
| Margaret Seagrave | Board President | — | ||
| Donna McDowell | Treasurer | — | ||
| Sarah Martell | Secretary | — | ||
| Kristin Joiner | Board Member | — | ||
| Jeffrey Hearn | Board Member | — | ||
| Lee Sessoms | Board Member | — | ||
| Kay Cleveland | Board Member | — | ||
| Lori Forster | Board Member | — | ||
| Elizabeth Murphy | Board Member | — | ||
| Bradley Sullivan | Board Member | — | ||
| Sanna Laird | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 124 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points above the peer median (75 vs. 37).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.