Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 64 Stable Stable Watch
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 59 Fragile Recovery
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RACHAEL MARSHALL Board President
JOSHUA APKE VICE PRESIDE
BRITTANY WEBB Secretary
STERLING WIDNER Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RACHAEL CRAGER Board President
SHANELL SCHUYLER Board President
LEIGH POWELL Secretary
JUSTIN MCSTAY-HARRISON Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 123 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 54 points above the peer median (90 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 64 over 5 years (improving by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.