Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
30
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 19.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 19.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 19.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 10.3% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LULIE EBAUGH Board Member 19.8% of Rev
LEAH MAYO Board President
ANN PULLEN Board President
CAROLYN BREARLEY Board Member
ANGIE STEGALL Secretary
BEVERYLY SCHRUM Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LULIE EBAUGH Board Member 16.0% of Rev
LULIE EBAUGH Board Member 8.4% of Rev
LEAH MAYO Board President
ANN PULLEN Board President
CAROLYN BREARLEY Treasurer
ANGIE STEGALL Secretary
LEAH MAYO Board President
ANN PULLEN Board President
CAROLYN BREARLEY Treasurer
ANGIE STEGALL Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ali Booker Board Member 9.5% of Rev
Chris Kerr Board President
Emily Hjort Board President
Beth Pollard Treasurer
Angie Stegall Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 124 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 7 points below the peer median (30 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.