Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — 12.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRAD PARHAM Board Member —
ERICK FIGUERAS Board Member —
CHRISTINE FISHER Board Member —
NANCY MATTHEWS Board Member —
VIVEK VASUKI Board Member —
BARRETT JACKSON Board Member —
SUE JONA Board Member —
MELISSA SCOTT Board Member —
BARRY BODIE Board Member —
MARLON MALVAGOMES Board Member —
ROBERT TILTON Board President —
FRANCES KAHN Secretary —
KALEY MORRELL Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT TILTON Board President —
ANN RODGERS CHANDLER Board Member —
BRAD PARHAM Board Member —
NICK TOWNSEND Board Member —
BLAKE PATE Board Member —
ERICK FIGUERAS Board Member —
CHRISTINE FISHER Board Member —
EDDIE PARKER Board Member —
ASHLEY STOKES Board Member —
FRANCES KAY Board Member —
BARRETT JACKSON Board Member —
SUE JONA Board Member —
MELISSA SCOTT Board Member —
LALLA SALEEBY Secretary —
NANCY MATTHEWS Board President —
VIEW VASUKI Treasurer —
BRIAN FAST PAST CHAIRMAN —
DR CARROLL PLAYER Board Member —
ANN RODGERS CHANDLER Board Member —
NICK TOWNSEND Board Member —
CHRISTINE WILLIAMS Board Member —
MELODEE WOOD Board Member —
JANE COMFORT Board Member —
BLAKE PATE Board Member —
SARAH SWEENEY Board Member —
ERICK FIGUERAS Board Member —
CHRISTINE FISHER Board Member —
EDDIE PARKER Board Member —
ASHLEY STOKES Board Member —
ROBERT TILTON Treasurer —
BARBARA RICE Board Member —
FRANCES KAHN Board Member —
ALEC HOGSETTE Secretary —
BRAD PARHAM CHAIRMAN —
LALLA SALEEBY Board Member —
NANCY MATTHEWS VICE-CHAIRMAN —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANDY RHEA Board Member —
BRIAN FAST PAST CHAIRMAN —
DR CARROLL PLAYER Board Member —
ANN RODGERS CHANDLER Board Member —
NICK TOWNSEND Board Member —
CHRISTINE WILLIAMS Board Member —
MELODEE WOOD Board Member —
JANE COMFORT Board Member —
BLAKE PATE Board Member —
ROXIE SMALLWOOD Board Member —
SARAH SWEENEY Board Member —
ERICK FIGUERAS Board Member —
CHRISTINE FISHER Board Member —
EDDIE PARKER Board Member —
MAUREEN PHILLIPS Board Member —
ASHLEY STOKES Board Member —
ROBERT TILTON Board Member —
ALEC HOGSETTE Treasurer —
BRAD PARHAM CHAIRMAN —
LALLA SALEEBY Secretary —
NANCY MATTHEWS VICE-CHAIRMAN —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 129 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.