Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 44 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 41 Fragile Recovery
2022 40.3% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Paul Pendell Board President
Ruthie Pilgrim Secretary
Sarah Potosky Treasurer
Jessica Morgan Board Member
Riley Henderson At Large
Amanda Barrett At Large
Gina League At Large
Mary Margaret St John At Large
Randy Lee At Large
Mark Hopper At Large
Elizabeth Stachalek At Large
Suzette Wood At Large

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kory Vrieze Artistic Director 30.2% of Rev
Riley Henderson Board President
Ruthie Pilgrim Secretary
Collin McKinnon Treasurer
Jessica Morgan Board Member
Sally Potosky At Large
Suzy Jones At Large
Gina League At Large
Mary Margaret St John At Large
Paul Pendell At Large
Mark Hopper At Large
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 97 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (55 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.