Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction ↑
Overall
39
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 27.4% 39 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden — 42 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 18.9% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 34.0% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 7.3% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRED DEVYATKIN CONDUCTOR 24.8% of Rev
AMI RABINOWITZ Board Member 2.6% of Rev
FAYE PATRICK ALSTON TICKETING —
RICHARD HOEKSEMA Board Member —
DON REXRODE YOUTH ORCHESTRA —
SAM SMITH FUNDRAISING —
JENNIFER FLANAGAN COMMUNICATIONS —
GRETA SANDBERG Board President —
ANN BUNNELL Treasurer —
JULIA BLAKE Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRED DEVYATKIN CONDUCTOR 23.8% of Rev
AMY RABINOWITZ YOUTH ORCHESTRA LIAISON 0.4% of Rev
CHARLES FROST PUBLIC RELATIONS 0.4% of Rev
RICHARD HOEKSEMA Board Member —
FAYE PATRICK ALSTON TICKETING —
GRETA SANDBERG Board President —
ED LIKE Board President —
IRWIN POTKEWITZ MD Board President —
JULIA BLAKE Secretary —
ANN E BUNNELL Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRED DEVYATKIN CONDUCTOR 8.2% of Rev
CHARLES FROST PUBLIC RELATIONS 0.3% of Rev
OLIVE WARRENFELTZ Board Member 0.2% of Rev
RICHARD HOEKSEMA Board Member —
JESSICA ROCKWELL LONG Board Member —
FAYE ALSTON Board Member —
GEORGE SAKAKINI Board Member —
JULIA BLAKE Board Member —
CYN FOLLRICH WEBSITE —
SUE WARD MEMBERSHIP & TICKETING —
JAYNE KREBS Board Member —
LYNNE VAN ETTEN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 130 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (42 vs. 59).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 27.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~11 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.