Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Robert Thompson Treasurer
Linda Langley Board President
Pat Laird Secretary
Cliff McBride Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Robert Thompson Treasurer
Linda Langley Board President
Jan Austin Secretary
Cliff McBride Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Robert Thompson Treasurer
Linda Langley Board President
Jan Austin Secretary
Cliff McBride Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 97 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (55 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 43 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.